Qualified Immunity Explained: Three Legal Principles You Should Know
Sarah Mills | November 12, 2020
As Black Lives Matter protests against police brutality remain a major theme in a tumultuous year, the doctrine of qualified immunity is having a moment in the spotlight. Long a controversial doctrine among legal scholars and civil rights attorneys, the defense has been expanded over the years to shield police officers who use force against civilians from liability. On the federal level, a proposed bill to end qualified immunity has not made any progress since its introduction in Congress.
In SCOTUS Review: Police Misconduct Under Section 1983, author and former administrative appeals judge Wayne Beyer discussed several Supreme Court cases that majorly impacted the doctrine of qualified immunity in recent years. Here are three legal principles plaintiff and defense attorneys alike need to be aware of:
Bystander Requirements. Some police departments require officers to stop or intervene with misconduct of other officers. To succeed in bystander liability, a plaintiff must show (1) a law enforcement officer knew that fellow officer was violating the plaintiff’s rights; (2) had reasonable opportunity to prevent harm; and (3) the officer did not act (Stevenson v. City of Seat Pleasant, 743 F.3d 411 (4th Cir. 2014).
Loss of Life under Section 1983. Large settlements in highly publicized cases raise issues of how §1983 death cases should be valued. Practitioners must know who has standing to sue in survival and wrongful death statutes of forum state and to what extent they have been applied in §1983 actions. Plaintiffs may also argue for supplemental federal remedies such as “hedonic” damages for loss of victim’s life or non-economic losses to family members such as grief or loss of companionship. Under 42 U.S.C. §1988, federal courts can borrow from state law if it meets compensation and deterrence goals of Section 1983.
Over the past several months, the Supreme Court has denied eight petitions of certiorari for qualified immunity cases, and there are no new qualified immunity cases scheduled for the 2020-2021 docket. This may be a relief for civil rights attorneys, given the current composition of the Court, but we will certainly be watching the Court for more developments.
To learn more about the doctrine of qualified immunity and obtain further resources, check out the full program here.
This article was prepared with help from Elsie Tan, a New York Law School student.
Sarah graduated from Simon's Rock College in 2005 with a BA in Linguistics, then worked in events production for several years before she graduated from New York Law School in 2012. Before joining Lawline, she worked in litigation management as a legal auditor. She loves working as a program attorney as it combines her legal knowledge and production background. She has two kids, two cats, and loves public transit and rainy days.