Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California is a landmark case in US law that established a legal duty for mental health professionals to warn potential victims of their patients. The case arose from the murder of a young woman, Tatiana Tarasoff, by a former patient of a university psychologist who had expressed an intent to harm her.
The case established a Duty to Protect or Duty to Warn for mental health providers, resulting in significant changes to the profession. It has been widely adopted by U.S. states and has influenced jurisdictions outside of the US.
The Significance of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
In 1969, Prosenjit Poddar, a student at the University of California at Berkeley, began seeing a psychologist at the university's Cowell Memorial Hospital. Poddar expressed his intent to kill Tarasoff, a young woman with whom he had become infatuated, to his therapist. However, the therapist did not inform Tarasoff or the police about the potential threat. Poddar eventually carried out his plan and killed Tarasoff.
Tarasoff's parents sued the Regents of the University of California, alleging that the therapist and the university had a duty to warn their daughter of the danger posed by Poddar. The case made its way to the California Supreme Court, which ruled in 1976 that mental health professionals have a duty to protect potential victims when they become aware of a serious threat of violence. The court held that the therapist should have warned Tarasoff of the danger posed by Poddar and that the university could be held liable for failing to implement policies to protect potential victims.
The significance of the Tarasoff case lies in its impact on mental health practice, with mental health professionals now required to take proactive steps to prevent harm to third parties. The case also led to the development of laws and regulations requiring mental health professionals to report threats of violence to potential victims and law enforcement agencies.
The Impact of Tarasoff on Mental Health Professionals
Prior to the Tarasoff ruling, mental health professionals considered the principle of confidentiality, which protected their clients' privacy and information, as sacrosanct and inviolable. However, this legal precedent changed the way mental health professionals approached confidentiality and mandated that they prioritize the safety of potential victims over their clients' privacy rights.
Mental health professionals became more aware of the potential risks posed by their patients and were required to take necessary steps to protect the public from harm. This legal duty includes the duty to warn potential victims, the duty to protect, and the duty to refer to specialized services.
The Tarasoff ruling also had a significant effect on the training of mental health professionals. Many training programs began to incorporate additional legal and ethical considerations in their curricula to prepare future clinicians to navigate the complex legal landscape of their profession.
The Impact of Tarasoff on Other States
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California had an impact not only on mental health professionals in California but also on other states across the United States. The legal duty to warn has been adopted by numerous other states and jurisdictions in the wake of the Tarasoff ruling.
The adoption of the Tarasoff ruling has varied across different states. 29 of our 50 states have adopted either a duty to warn and/or protect. 17 states have a “permissive” duty to warn and/or protect, which allows leeway in the form of disclosure or consultation with colleagues or attorneys in cases of uncertainty. Ten of those states that recognize the duty to warn and/or protect are not based in statute, but in case law. Only four states have not recognized such a duty.
Watch Any Course for Free
Start a no-risk free trial today to watch any Lawline On Demand course for free. Choose from over 1,800 courses, including attorney well-being, ethics, professional development and 40+ practice areas. No credit card required, no catch.
Lawline is an online platform that provides continuing legal education courses to attorneys in a wide range of practice areas. The platform offers a broad array of courses on various topics, including the latest legal developments, emerging trends, and best practices. As an attorney, Lawline can help you stay up-to-date with the law and maintain your license by providing you with the necessary continuing legal education credits.